Process & Results

“No effort in this world
is lost or wasted;
a fragment of sacred duty
saves you from great fear.”
-The Bhagavad-Gita, Chapter 2, Verse 40 trans by Barbara Stoler Miller

For many years, I have believed that process is more important than product. You do not always have control over outcomes. Even with our best efforts, it is often the case that people fail.

However, I have recently come to see another kind of failure among people that only care about process. When you remove results from consideration, then a certain subset of people believe it is enough to have made an attempt, to have participated. However, they do not want to be responsible for outcomes.

These people wash the dishes. However, it does not concern them whether the dishes are clean after their process. To this archetype, this pattern repeats across a wide swath of their activities. It is enough to have made some minimal effort. I called. I talked to someone. They performed some action, and this is enough. It does not matter to them whether they accomplished the task, or not. In some cases, people with this problem desperately do not want responsibility – not to accomplish a task or even for their own lives. They want someone else to blame for their problems.

This reveals a problem in focusing on process. The implicit assumption is that people involved in the process are making their best effort. They are improving the process. The reality is that you cannot improve a process without a focus on outcomes nor can you judge how well a process works without them.

If you are just going through a process and completing it counts, you simply have a system to rationalize failure.

Newsboat

Newsboat is the Mutt of RSS readers. Works and looks pretty much the same as mutt. In making the conversion, I learned that I have over 500 RSS feeds, which in combination with a few dozen newsletters via email is how I discover the material to post to this blog.

I used to use an app on my phone to scroll through when I had time, but I found using Newsboat sped up the process considerably. So, even though I have to sit down at the computer and go through each feed, Newsboat will be my default method moving forward. Recommended.

Do The Easy Bits First

“As soon as you’ve done the easy bit, everything around it becomes easier. This is the way we solve the puzzle.

This is also the way we fix the world…

…If I run into a problem I can’t solve yet, or I encounter a subject that’s too hard for me, I go “Huh, interesting”, and save it for later, or leave it to someone better suited to it.

I don’t give up. This is important. I just move on to something else, often something nearby.

I find a problem I can solve, and then I solve it.

And everything else becomes easier.”

—David R. MacIver, “You have to do the easy bits first.” notebook.drmaciver.com, July 27, 2021.

Strikes me as in the same space as my recent commentary on incrementalism. This is the way, but most problems are not jigsaw or Sudoku puzzles. The temptation with problems without a clear endpoint is to do the minimum necessary.

A Page A Day = A Book A Year

“Lately, I’ve been following a dictum I first heard from writing coach Donald M. Murray. “A page a day,” he said, “is a book a year.”As the author of more than a dozen books, Murray knew what he was talking about. A double-spaced page of prose is 250 words. Multiply that by 365 days and you could produce 91,250 words in 2020. Give yourself vacation time and days off and you can still generate enough copy for the writing project you’ve been putting off, a body of work that you can revise.  A page a day is doable as I’ve learned over the past month, and it’s not uncommon to double that. My resolution is to keep it up. Perhaps it will work for you.”

—Donald M. Murray quoted in Chip Scanlon, “#15 A Page a Day, The Iceberg Theory of Writing, John Branch on Believing In What You Write, The Loneliness of Writing.” Chip in Your Inbox. January 3, 2020

Chip Scanlon’s newsletter is pure gold.

The Resulting Fallacy Is Ruining Your Decisions – Issue 55: Trust – Nautilus

“In life, it’s usually even more complicated because in most real decisions we haven’t examined the coin. We don’t know if it is a fair coin, if it has two sides with a heads and tails on it and is weighted properly.

That’s the hidden information problem. We can’t see everything. We haven’t experienced everything. We know the facts that we know, but there may be facts that we don’t know. Then the job of the decider is to reduce the uncertainty as much as they possibly can, but to understand that they’re always working within a range and they have limited control over how things turn out on any given try.”

—Stuart Firestein, “The Resulting Fallacy Is Ruining Your Decisions.” Nautilus. Issue 55.