Pretty amazing accomplishment when you think of everything that went into making this happen, from the assembly line pipeline to the willingness to test and fail vehicles, it really conveys what is possible when you have the right leadership, incentives and willingness to take risk.
“Colette has won the Academy Award in the category of best documentary short…90-year-old Colette Marin-Catherine confronts her past by visiting the German concentration camp Mittelbau-Dora where her brother was killed. As a young girl, she fought Hitler’s Nazis as a member of the French Resistance. For 74 years, she has refused to step foot in Germany, but that changes when a young history student named Lucie enters her life. Prepared to re-open old wounds and revisit the terrors of that time, Marin-Catherine offers important lessons for us all.”–Anthony Giacchino, “Collette.” The Guardian. November 2020.
I got about half way through this and wanted to return to it when I could give it my full attention. Figured I’d bookmark it here as a memory aid.
Interesting throughout. Main points:
- Build in abstractions, with symbols and functions.
- Counter-intuitively, abstractions make precision possible.
- The more expressive a language, the more ambiguous the content.
- Or more generally, freedom at one level implies constraints at another level.
- Plan for interoperability and extension, which also implies limits.
- As much authority is necessary, but no more.
- The more something can do, the less predictable what it will do becomes.
- The more capable your syntax, the fewer semantics.
- The larger the group, the less you can say about it and be accurate.
- Don’t optimize too early.
If you aren’t a programmer, you might ask yourself: how is this applicable to me? And, I think the answer to that is that these are universal truths that programming, and perhaps math more generally, reveals about the larger world.
For example, when you have complete freedom to live your life in any way that you want, what do you choose? What ends up happening is that people don’t choose at all. Their lives become a series of accidents, which they accept and later rationalize as choice.
But, by imposing limits, which is a kind of choice, you can throw other choices into sharper relief. If you choose to be vegan, then that constraint effects a whole range of choices you might make from the food that you buy, restaurants you consider supporting, and even broader issues, such as your politics. You may, if you live in the United States, be unable to support either major political party since both support factory farming.
Or, perhaps you decide to adopt the religion of The Society of Friends, also known as Quakers. This implies ethics of peace, integrity, equality, and simplicity. These, in turn, might lead to other choices, such as non-violence protest, refusing to take oaths, working on freeing people in slavery in the modern world, or living on a certain level of income and avoiding participating in the money economy.
Or, you might decide to focus your efforts on becoming famous. That choice largely closes off the Quaker pathway, and vice versa. Although, perhaps if you limited your aspirations to fellow Quakers, it could be accommodated.
Constraints require making choices, but then, it opens up a freedom to choose within the context of those choices. This is obviously true in life, but so much so it is also easy to miss. A computer program makes the trade-off easier to see.
Empathy is feeling with people.
- Perspective taking
- Staying out of judgment
- Recognizing emotion in other people
A response doesn’t make something better but a connection can.
“From Bali to Paris, the readers in Véronique Aubouy’s huge project, ‘Proust Lu’ (‘Proust Read’), have been captured in bedrooms, offices, supermarkets, factories and beauty spots. Farmers, schoolchildren, businessmen, even the French director’s doctor have participated. ‘It’s a slice of life,’ Ms Aubouy says; ‘a reading about time, in time.’ The cast is as diverse as the novel’s, brought together by their own web of connections and coincidences.”—”A tag-team reading of ‘In Search of Lost Time’.” The Economist. February 6, 2021.
I love this idea. I’ve picked up the first volume of Proust’s book, and I didn’t like it. I stopped maybe 50 pages in. But, I can imagine tackling the novel in this way. It’s ~4,000 pages long. If you wanted to read it in a year, you’d need to read 11 pages a day. It’s doable, but it seems like a tough slog.
But, 2 pages a day over the course of 6 years, assuming you missed a couple of hundred days and added a page or two here and there? That seems to be exactly the kind of reading this book calls for.
Also, some of the readings from Proust Lu are on YouTube, in French, bien sûr.
“Starting back in 2007, when we favored a more conventional top 10 list, this playlist celebrates ALL the winners of our ‘Short of the Year’ prize – if you ever wondered what are the best short films ever featured on S/W, this playlist is a good place to start.”—Rob Munday, “Short of the Year Playlist.” shortoftheweek.com. February 9, 202